Fredy Alexander Jaimes Caceres vs Nicolas De Jesus Gomez
2015 · Result 0–1 · Scandinavian Defense (B01).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Fredy Alexander Jaimes Caceres vs Nicolas De Jesus Gomez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Fredy Alexander Jaimes Caceres (1818)
- Black
- Nicolas De Jesus Gomez (1642)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Scandinavian Defense (B01)
About this chess game
This chess game between Fredy Alexander Jaimes Caceres (1818) and Nicolas De Jesus Gomez (1642) was played in 2015 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Scandinavian Defense (B01). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Fredy Alexander Jaimes Caceres games or Nicolas De Jesus Gomez games? This Fredy Alexander Jaimes Caceres vs Nicolas De Jesus Gomez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Scandinavian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Fredy Alexander Jaimes Caceres vs Nicolas De Jesus Gomez?
Fredy Alexander Jaimes Caceres vs Nicolas De Jesus Gomez (2015) finished 0–1, a win for Nicolas De Jesus Gomez.
What opening was played in Fredy Alexander Jaimes Caceres vs Nicolas De Jesus Gomez?
The game opened with the Scandinavian Defense (ECO B01).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Fredy Alexander Jaimes Caceres vs Nicolas De Jesus Gomez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.