Enrique Jacopucci vs Jeroen Louis Koster
40. Olympiad Open, 2012 · Result 0–1 · Dutch Defense: Queen's Knight Variation (A85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Enrique Jacopucci vs Jeroen Louis Koster with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Enrique Jacopucci (1805)
- Black
- Jeroen Louis Koster (1846)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 40. Olympiad Open
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Queen's Knight Variation (A85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Enrique Jacopucci (1805) and Jeroen Louis Koster (1846) was played at 40. Olympiad Open in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Queen's Knight Variation (A85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Enrique Jacopucci games or Jeroen Louis Koster games? This Enrique Jacopucci vs Jeroen Louis Koster encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Queen's Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Enrique Jacopucci vs Jeroen Louis Koster?
Enrique Jacopucci vs Jeroen Louis Koster (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Jeroen Louis Koster.
What opening was played in Enrique Jacopucci vs Jeroen Louis Koster?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Queen's Knight Variation (ECO A85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Enrique Jacopucci vs Jeroen Louis Koster, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.