Erik Holm Jacobsen vs Soren Rud Ottesen
2012 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Erik Holm Jacobsen vs Soren Rud Ottesen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Erik Holm Jacobsen (2051)
- Black
- Soren Rud Ottesen (1792)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Erik Holm Jacobsen (2051) and Soren Rud Ottesen (1792) was played in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Erik Holm Jacobsen games or Soren Rud Ottesen games? This Erik Holm Jacobsen vs Soren Rud Ottesen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Erik Holm Jacobsen vs Soren Rud Ottesen?
Erik Holm Jacobsen vs Soren Rud Ottesen (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Erik Holm Jacobsen vs Soren Rud Ottesen?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (ECO B92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Erik Holm Jacobsen vs Soren Rud Ottesen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.