Mikkel Manosri Jacobsen vs Marte Bakken Kyrkjebo
2013 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mikkel Manosri Jacobsen vs Marte Bakken Kyrkjebo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mikkel Manosri Jacobsen (1836)
- Black
- Marte Bakken Kyrkjebo (1632)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mikkel Manosri Jacobsen (1836) and Marte Bakken Kyrkjebo (1632) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mikkel Manosri Jacobsen games or Marte Bakken Kyrkjebo games? This Mikkel Manosri Jacobsen vs Marte Bakken Kyrkjebo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mikkel Manosri Jacobsen vs Marte Bakken Kyrkjebo?
Mikkel Manosri Jacobsen vs Marte Bakken Kyrkjebo (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Mikkel Manosri Jacobsen vs Marte Bakken Kyrkjebo?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mikkel Manosri Jacobsen vs Marte Bakken Kyrkjebo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.