Charles Jacobs Jr. vs Brandon Gilliland
WS/CCE/A/19, 2021 · Result ½–½ · Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Meran Variation (D45).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Charles Jacobs Jr. vs Brandon Gilliland with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Charles Jacobs Jr. (2187)
- Black
- Brandon Gilliland (2170)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- WS/CCE/A/19
- Year
- 2021
- Opening
- Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Meran Variation (D45)
About this chess game
This chess game between Charles Jacobs Jr. (2187) and Brandon Gilliland (2170) was played at WS/CCE/A/19 in 2021 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Meran Variation (D45). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Charles Jacobs Jr. games or Brandon Gilliland games? This Charles Jacobs Jr. vs Brandon Gilliland encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Meran Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Charles Jacobs Jr. vs Brandon Gilliland?
Charles Jacobs Jr. vs Brandon Gilliland (2021) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Charles Jacobs Jr. vs Brandon Gilliland?
The game opened with the Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Meran Variation (ECO D45).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Charles Jacobs Jr. vs Brandon Gilliland, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.