Florienz Gabrielle Jacobe vs Alain Reitz
Corr DDR, 1989 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Florienz Gabrielle Jacobe vs Alain Reitz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- Black
- Alain Reitz
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Corr DDR
- Year
- 1989
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81)
About this chess game
This chess game between Florienz Gabrielle Jacobe and Alain Reitz was played at Corr DDR in 1989 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Florienz Gabrielle Jacobe games or Alain Reitz games? This Florienz Gabrielle Jacobe vs Alain Reitz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Florienz Gabrielle Jacobe vs Alain Reitz?
Florienz Gabrielle Jacobe vs Alain Reitz (1989) finished 1–0, a win for Florienz Gabrielle Jacobe.
What opening was played in Florienz Gabrielle Jacobe vs Alain Reitz?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (ECO E81).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Florienz Gabrielle Jacobe vs Alain Reitz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.