Adrian Jackson vs David A Farndon
Deloitte & Touche Tohmatsu Int., 1999 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation, Early Deviations (B66).
Analyze this game
Open Adrian Jackson vs David A Farndon on the CipherChess board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Open the Analysis BoardMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Adrian Jackson (2208)
- Black
- David A Farndon (2263)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Deloitte & Touche Tohmatsu Int.
- Year
- 1999
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation, Early Deviations (B66)
About this chess game
This chess game between Adrian Jackson (2208) and David A Farndon (2263) was played at Deloitte & Touche Tohmatsu Int. in 1999 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation, Early Deviations (B66). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Adrian Jackson games or David A Farndon games? This Adrian Jackson vs David A Farndon encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation, Early Deviations.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Adrian Jackson vs David A Farndon?
Adrian Jackson vs David A Farndon (1999) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Adrian Jackson vs David A Farndon?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation, Early Deviations (ECO B66).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Adrian Jackson vs David A Farndon, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.