Christoph Jablonowski vs Tom Van De Perre
2014 · Result ½–½ · Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (A88).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Christoph Jablonowski vs Tom Van De Perre with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Christoph Jablonowski (2010)
- Black
- Tom Van De Perre (2121)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (A88)
About this chess game
This chess game between Christoph Jablonowski (2010) and Tom Van De Perre (2121) was played in 2014 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (A88). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Christoph Jablonowski games or Tom Van De Perre games? This Christoph Jablonowski vs Tom Van De Perre encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Christoph Jablonowski vs Tom Van De Perre?
Christoph Jablonowski vs Tom Van De Perre (2014) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Christoph Jablonowski vs Tom Van De Perre?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (ECO A88).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Christoph Jablonowski vs Tom Van De Perre, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.