Alexey Izmestiev vs Maxim Sukhov
2007 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System, Main Line (D29).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexey Izmestiev vs Maxim Sukhov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexey Izmestiev (2074)
- Black
- Maxim Sukhov (2098)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2007
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System, Main Line (D29)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexey Izmestiev (2074) and Maxim Sukhov (2098) was played in 2007 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System, Main Line (D29). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexey Izmestiev games or Maxim Sukhov games? This Alexey Izmestiev vs Maxim Sukhov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexey Izmestiev vs Maxim Sukhov?
Alexey Izmestiev vs Maxim Sukhov (2007) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Alexey Izmestiev vs Maxim Sukhov?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System, Main Line (ECO D29).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexey Izmestiev vs Maxim Sukhov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.