Roman Eric Ivic vs Christian Richter
2009 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Roman Eric Ivic vs Christian Richter with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Roman Eric Ivic (2233)
- Black
- Christian Richter (2409)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94)
About this chess game
This chess game between Roman Eric Ivic (2233) and Christian Richter (2409) was played in 2009 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Roman Eric Ivic games or Christian Richter games? This Roman Eric Ivic vs Christian Richter encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Roman Eric Ivic vs Christian Richter?
Roman Eric Ivic vs Christian Richter (2009) finished 0–1, a win for Christian Richter.
What opening was played in Roman Eric Ivic vs Christian Richter?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (ECO E94).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Roman Eric Ivic vs Christian Richter, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.