Inna Ivakhinova vs Indira Bajt
Aeroflot Open B, 2011 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Inna Ivakhinova vs Indira Bajt with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Inna Ivakhinova (2324)
- Black
- Indira Bajt (2215)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Aeroflot Open B
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94)
About this chess game
This chess game between Inna Ivakhinova (2324) and Indira Bajt (2215) was played at Aeroflot Open B in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Inna Ivakhinova games or Indira Bajt games? This Inna Ivakhinova vs Indira Bajt encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Inna Ivakhinova vs Indira Bajt?
Inna Ivakhinova vs Indira Bajt (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Inna Ivakhinova.
What opening was played in Inna Ivakhinova vs Indira Bajt?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (ECO E94).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Inna Ivakhinova vs Indira Bajt, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.