Renan Fortes Itagyba vs Daniel Landshoff Farah
2019 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (A08).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Renan Fortes Itagyba vs Daniel Landshoff Farah with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Renan Fortes Itagyba (1735)
- Black
- Daniel Landshoff Farah (1905)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (A08)
About this chess game
This chess game between Renan Fortes Itagyba (1735) and Daniel Landshoff Farah (1905) was played in 2019 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (A08). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Renan Fortes Itagyba games or Daniel Landshoff Farah games? This Renan Fortes Itagyba vs Daniel Landshoff Farah encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Renan Fortes Itagyba vs Daniel Landshoff Farah?
Renan Fortes Itagyba vs Daniel Landshoff Farah (2019) finished 0–1, a win for Daniel Landshoff Farah.
What opening was played in Renan Fortes Itagyba vs Daniel Landshoff Farah?
The game opened with the King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (ECO A08).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Renan Fortes Itagyba vs Daniel Landshoff Farah, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.