Alexander Ipatov vs Petar Genov
Memorial Venka Asenova&Antonia Ivanova, 2010 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation (E43).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexander Ipatov vs Petar Genov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexander Ipatov (2518)
- Black
- Petar Genov (2452)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Memorial Venka Asenova&Antonia Ivanova
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation (E43)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexander Ipatov (2518) and Petar Genov (2452) was played at Memorial Venka Asenova&Antonia Ivanova in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation (E43). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexander Ipatov games or Petar Genov games? This Alexander Ipatov vs Petar Genov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexander Ipatov vs Petar Genov?
Alexander Ipatov vs Petar Genov (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Petar Genov.
What opening was played in Alexander Ipatov vs Petar Genov?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation (ECO E43).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexander Ipatov vs Petar Genov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.