Claudiu-Badea Iordache vs Otto Delfrati
ROM-chT2, date unknown · Result 1–0 · Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense (C75).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Claudiu-Badea Iordache vs Otto Delfrati with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Claudiu-Badea Iordache (2210)
- Black
- Otto Delfrati (1690)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- ROM-chT2
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense (C75)
About this chess game
This chess game between Claudiu-Badea Iordache (2210) and Otto Delfrati (1690) was played at ROM-chT2 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense (C75). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Claudiu-Badea Iordache games or Otto Delfrati games? This Claudiu-Badea Iordache vs Otto Delfrati encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Claudiu-Badea Iordache vs Otto Delfrati?
Claudiu-Badea Iordache vs Otto Delfrati finished 1–0, a win for Claudiu-Badea Iordache.
What opening was played in Claudiu-Badea Iordache vs Otto Delfrati?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense (ECO C75).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Claudiu-Badea Iordache vs Otto Delfrati, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.