Katia Innocenti vs Ozgur Aktunc
CP.2002.Q.00005, 2003 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Long Variation (E68).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Katia Innocenti vs Ozgur Aktunc with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Katia Innocenti (1998)
- Black
- Ozgur Aktunc (1967)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- CP.2002.Q.00005
- Year
- 2003
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Long Variation (E68)
About this chess game
This chess game between Katia Innocenti (1998) and Ozgur Aktunc (1967) was played at CP.2002.Q.00005 in 2003 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Long Variation (E68). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Katia Innocenti games or Ozgur Aktunc games? This Katia Innocenti vs Ozgur Aktunc encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Long Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Katia Innocenti vs Ozgur Aktunc?
Katia Innocenti vs Ozgur Aktunc (2003) finished 1–0, a win for Katia Innocenti.
What opening was played in Katia Innocenti vs Ozgur Aktunc?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Long Variation (ECO E68).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Katia Innocenti vs Ozgur Aktunc, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.