Ventzislav Inkiov vs Alexandros Gogolis
19. Iraklio Open 2016, 2016 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (E26).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ventzislav Inkiov vs Alexandros Gogolis with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ventzislav Inkiov (2467)
- Black
- Alexandros Gogolis (2233)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 19. Iraklio Open 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (E26)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ventzislav Inkiov (2467) and Alexandros Gogolis (2233) was played at 19. Iraklio Open 2016 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (E26). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ventzislav Inkiov games or Alexandros Gogolis games? This Ventzislav Inkiov vs Alexandros Gogolis encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ventzislav Inkiov vs Alexandros Gogolis?
Ventzislav Inkiov vs Alexandros Gogolis (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Ventzislav Inkiov.
What opening was played in Ventzislav Inkiov vs Alexandros Gogolis?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (ECO E26).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ventzislav Inkiov vs Alexandros Gogolis, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.