Feliciano Incicco vs Getaches Reta Mekdes
79. ch-ARG, 2004 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E91).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Feliciano Incicco vs Getaches Reta Mekdes with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Feliciano Incicco (1698)
- Black
- Getaches Reta Mekdes (2188)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 79. ch-ARG
- Year
- 2004
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E91)
About this chess game
This chess game between Feliciano Incicco (1698) and Getaches Reta Mekdes (2188) was played at 79. ch-ARG in 2004 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E91). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Feliciano Incicco games or Getaches Reta Mekdes games? This Feliciano Incicco vs Getaches Reta Mekdes encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Feliciano Incicco vs Getaches Reta Mekdes?
Feliciano Incicco vs Getaches Reta Mekdes (2004) finished 0–1, a win for Getaches Reta Mekdes.
What opening was played in Feliciano Incicco vs Getaches Reta Mekdes?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (ECO E91).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Feliciano Incicco vs Getaches Reta Mekdes, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.