Ernesto Inarkiev vs Alexander Onischuk
69. Moscow Blitz, 2015 · Result ½–½ · Catalan Opening: Open Defense, Classical Line (E05).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ernesto Inarkiev vs Alexander Onischuk with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ernesto Inarkiev (2660)
- Black
- Alexander Onischuk (2662)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 69. Moscow Blitz
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Catalan Opening: Open Defense, Classical Line (E05)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ernesto Inarkiev (2660) and Alexander Onischuk (2662) was played at 69. Moscow Blitz in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Catalan Opening: Open Defense, Classical Line (E05). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ernesto Inarkiev games or Alexander Onischuk games? This Ernesto Inarkiev vs Alexander Onischuk encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Catalan Opening: Open Defense, Classical Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ernesto Inarkiev vs Alexander Onischuk?
Ernesto Inarkiev vs Alexander Onischuk (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Ernesto Inarkiev vs Alexander Onischuk?
The game opened with the Catalan Opening: Open Defense, Classical Line (ECO E05).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ernesto Inarkiev vs Alexander Onischuk, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.