Vyacheslav Ikonnikov vs Tijmen Kampman
Dutch League 2018-19, 2018 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E91).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vyacheslav Ikonnikov vs Tijmen Kampman with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vyacheslav Ikonnikov (2546)
- Black
- Tijmen Kampman (2209)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Dutch League 2018-19
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E91)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vyacheslav Ikonnikov (2546) and Tijmen Kampman (2209) was played at Dutch League 2018-19 in 2018 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E91). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vyacheslav Ikonnikov games or Tijmen Kampman games? This Vyacheslav Ikonnikov vs Tijmen Kampman encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vyacheslav Ikonnikov vs Tijmen Kampman?
Vyacheslav Ikonnikov vs Tijmen Kampman (2018) finished 1–0, a win for Vyacheslav Ikonnikov.
What opening was played in Vyacheslav Ikonnikov vs Tijmen Kampman?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (ECO E91).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vyacheslav Ikonnikov vs Tijmen Kampman, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.