Guillermo Iduate vs Antonio 2012 Fernandez Rodriguez
2015 · Result ½–½ · Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (A82).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Guillermo Iduate vs Antonio 2012 Fernandez Rodriguez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Guillermo Iduate (1772)
- Black
- Antonio 2012 Fernandez Rodriguez (1923)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (A82)
About this chess game
This chess game between Guillermo Iduate (1772) and Antonio 2012 Fernandez Rodriguez (1923) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (A82). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Guillermo Iduate games or Antonio 2012 Fernandez Rodriguez games? This Guillermo Iduate vs Antonio 2012 Fernandez Rodriguez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Guillermo Iduate vs Antonio 2012 Fernandez Rodriguez?
Guillermo Iduate vs Antonio 2012 Fernandez Rodriguez (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Guillermo Iduate vs Antonio 2012 Fernandez Rodriguez?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (ECO A82).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Guillermo Iduate vs Antonio 2012 Fernandez Rodriguez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.