Doan Minh Ngoc Huynh vs Thanh Thuy Tien Nguyen
2014 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Doan Minh Ngoc Huynh vs Thanh Thuy Tien Nguyen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Doan Minh Ngoc Huynh (1900)
- Black
- Thanh Thuy Tien Nguyen (1870)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80)
About this chess game
This chess game between Doan Minh Ngoc Huynh (1900) and Thanh Thuy Tien Nguyen (1870) was played in 2014 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Doan Minh Ngoc Huynh games or Thanh Thuy Tien Nguyen games? This Doan Minh Ngoc Huynh vs Thanh Thuy Tien Nguyen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Doan Minh Ngoc Huynh vs Thanh Thuy Tien Nguyen?
Doan Minh Ngoc Huynh vs Thanh Thuy Tien Nguyen (2014) finished 0–1, a win for Thanh Thuy Tien Nguyen.
What opening was played in Doan Minh Ngoc Huynh vs Thanh Thuy Tien Nguyen?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (ECO B80).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Doan Minh Ngoc Huynh vs Thanh Thuy Tien Nguyen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.