Alvaro Arturo Huertas Botache vs Estefania Cespedes Galindo
2011 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alvaro Arturo Huertas Botache vs Estefania Cespedes Galindo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- Black
- Estefania Cespedes Galindo (1822)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alvaro Arturo Huertas Botache and Estefania Cespedes Galindo (1822) was played in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alvaro Arturo Huertas Botache games or Estefania Cespedes Galindo games? This Alvaro Arturo Huertas Botache vs Estefania Cespedes Galindo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Closed.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alvaro Arturo Huertas Botache vs Estefania Cespedes Galindo?
Alvaro Arturo Huertas Botache vs Estefania Cespedes Galindo (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Estefania Cespedes Galindo.
What opening was played in Alvaro Arturo Huertas Botache vs Estefania Cespedes Galindo?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Closed (ECO B23).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alvaro Arturo Huertas Botache vs Estefania Cespedes Galindo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.