Lea Hudson vs David Elwood
SCO/L3/17 (SCO), 2017 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (B31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Lea Hudson vs David Elwood with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Lea Hudson (1875)
- Black
- David Elwood (1743)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- SCO/L3/17 (SCO)
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (B31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Lea Hudson (1875) and David Elwood (1743) was played at SCO/L3/17 (SCO) in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (B31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Lea Hudson games or David Elwood games? This Lea Hudson vs David Elwood encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Lea Hudson vs David Elwood?
Lea Hudson vs David Elwood (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Lea Hudson.
What opening was played in Lea Hudson vs David Elwood?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (ECO B31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Lea Hudson vs David Elwood, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.