David Hozda vs Vadim Shishkin
Teplice Open 2012, 2012 · Result 0–1 · Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David Hozda vs Vadim Shishkin with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David Hozda (1969)
- Black
- Vadim Shishkin (2497)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Teplice Open 2012
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93)
About this chess game
This chess game between David Hozda (1969) and Vadim Shishkin (2497) was played at Teplice Open 2012 in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David Hozda games or Vadim Shishkin games? This David Hozda vs Vadim Shishkin encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David Hozda vs Vadim Shishkin?
David Hozda vs Vadim Shishkin (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Vadim Shishkin.
What opening was played in David Hozda vs Vadim Shishkin?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (ECO D93).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David Hozda vs Vadim Shishkin, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.