David W L Howell vs Michael Fedorovsky
Bundesliga 2016-17, 2017 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Geller Variation (A33).
Analyze this game
Open David W L Howell vs Michael Fedorovsky on the CipherChess board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Open the Analysis BoardMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David W L Howell (2684)
- Black
- Michael Fedorovsky (2490)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Bundesliga 2016-17
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Geller Variation (A33)
About this chess game
This chess game between David W L Howell (2684) and Michael Fedorovsky (2490) was played at Bundesliga 2016-17 in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Geller Variation (A33). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David W L Howell games or Michael Fedorovsky games? This David W L Howell vs Michael Fedorovsky encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Geller Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David W L Howell vs Michael Fedorovsky?
David W L Howell vs Michael Fedorovsky (2017) finished 1–0, a win for David W L Howell.
What opening was played in David W L Howell vs Michael Fedorovsky?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Geller Variation (ECO A33).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David W L Howell vs Michael Fedorovsky, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.