Esben Kjems Hove vs Nicolai Kvist Brondt
Copenhagen CC IM 2020, 2020 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Esben Kjems Hove vs Nicolai Kvist Brondt with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Esben Kjems Hove (2324)
- Black
- Nicolai Kvist Brondt (2223)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Copenhagen CC IM 2020
- Year
- 2020
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Esben Kjems Hove (2324) and Nicolai Kvist Brondt (2223) was played at Copenhagen CC IM 2020 in 2020 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Esben Kjems Hove games or Nicolai Kvist Brondt games? This Esben Kjems Hove vs Nicolai Kvist Brondt encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Esben Kjems Hove vs Nicolai Kvist Brondt?
Esben Kjems Hove vs Nicolai Kvist Brondt (2020) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Esben Kjems Hove vs Nicolai Kvist Brondt?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Esben Kjems Hove vs Nicolai Kvist Brondt, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.