Randall Hough vs Richard Irwin
CFNC Ch, 1964 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Double Fianchetto Attack (E64).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Randall Hough vs Richard Irwin with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Randall Hough (2125)
- Black
- Richard Irwin
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- CFNC Ch
- Year
- 1964
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Double Fianchetto Attack (E64)
About this chess game
This chess game between Randall Hough (2125) and Richard Irwin was played at CFNC Ch in 1964 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Double Fianchetto Attack (E64). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Randall Hough games or Richard Irwin games? This Randall Hough vs Richard Irwin encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Double Fianchetto Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Randall Hough vs Richard Irwin?
Randall Hough vs Richard Irwin (1964) finished 0–1, a win for Richard Irwin.
What opening was played in Randall Hough vs Richard Irwin?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Double Fianchetto Attack (ECO E64).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Randall Hough vs Richard Irwin, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.