Hermann Holzinger vs Thomas Wadsack
2012 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation (D61).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Hermann Holzinger vs Thomas Wadsack with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Hermann Holzinger (1843)
- Black
- Thomas Wadsack (1770)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation (D61)
About this chess game
This chess game between Hermann Holzinger (1843) and Thomas Wadsack (1770) was played in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation (D61). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Hermann Holzinger games or Thomas Wadsack games? This Hermann Holzinger vs Thomas Wadsack encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Hermann Holzinger vs Thomas Wadsack?
Hermann Holzinger vs Thomas Wadsack (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Hermann Holzinger.
What opening was played in Hermann Holzinger vs Thomas Wadsack?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation (ECO D61).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Hermann Holzinger vs Thomas Wadsack, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.