Bob Holliman vs Liudmila Mokriak
Okie B, 2007 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Bob Holliman vs Liudmila Mokriak with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Bob Holliman (2143)
- Black
- Liudmila Mokriak (2167)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Okie B
- Year
- 2007
- Opening
- English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16)
About this chess game
This chess game between Bob Holliman (2143) and Liudmila Mokriak (2167) was played at Okie B in 2007 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Bob Holliman games or Liudmila Mokriak games? This Bob Holliman vs Liudmila Mokriak encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Bob Holliman vs Liudmila Mokriak?
Bob Holliman vs Liudmila Mokriak (2007) finished 1–0, a win for Bob Holliman.
What opening was played in Bob Holliman vs Liudmila Mokriak?
The game opened with the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (ECO A16).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Bob Holliman vs Liudmila Mokriak, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.