Istvan Hoflinger vs Miklos Ferencz
2015 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (E18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Istvan Hoflinger vs Miklos Ferencz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Istvan Hoflinger (1839)
- Black
- Miklos Ferencz (1691)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (E18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Istvan Hoflinger (1839) and Miklos Ferencz (1691) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (E18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Istvan Hoflinger games or Miklos Ferencz games? This Istvan Hoflinger vs Miklos Ferencz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Istvan Hoflinger vs Miklos Ferencz?
Istvan Hoflinger vs Miklos Ferencz (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Istvan Hoflinger vs Miklos Ferencz?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (ECO E18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Istvan Hoflinger vs Miklos Ferencz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.