Josef Hoedl Schlehhofer vs Heinz Jahrbacher
date unknown · Result 1–0 · Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Josef Hoedl Schlehhofer vs Heinz Jahrbacher with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Josef Hoedl Schlehhofer (1795)
- Black
- Heinz Jahrbacher (1885)
- Result
- 1–0
- Opening
- Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Josef Hoedl Schlehhofer (1795) and Heinz Jahrbacher (1885) was played and finished 1–0. The opening was the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Josef Hoedl Schlehhofer games or Heinz Jahrbacher games? This Josef Hoedl Schlehhofer vs Heinz Jahrbacher encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Josef Hoedl Schlehhofer vs Heinz Jahrbacher?
Josef Hoedl Schlehhofer vs Heinz Jahrbacher finished 1–0, a win for Josef Hoedl Schlehhofer.
What opening was played in Josef Hoedl Schlehhofer vs Heinz Jahrbacher?
The game opened with the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (ECO A42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Josef Hoedl Schlehhofer vs Heinz Jahrbacher, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.