Johann Hochmeister vs Frank-Michael Gutzelnig
Vienna op-C 14th, date unknown · Result ½–½ · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Johann Hochmeister vs Frank-Michael Gutzelnig with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Johann Hochmeister
- Black
- Frank-Michael Gutzelnig (1790)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Vienna op-C 14th
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Johann Hochmeister and Frank-Michael Gutzelnig (1790) was played at Vienna op-C 14th and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Johann Hochmeister games or Frank-Michael Gutzelnig games? This Johann Hochmeister vs Frank-Michael Gutzelnig encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Johann Hochmeister vs Frank-Michael Gutzelnig?
Johann Hochmeister vs Frank-Michael Gutzelnig finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Johann Hochmeister vs Frank-Michael Gutzelnig?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Johann Hochmeister vs Frank-Michael Gutzelnig, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.