Matthew Ho vs Mike Van Renootere
Labor Day, Union City, Rd, date unknown · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation (B57).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Matthew Ho vs Mike Van Renootere with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Matthew Ho (2050)
- Black
- Mike Van Renootere
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Labor Day, Union City, Rd
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation (B57)
About this chess game
This chess game between Matthew Ho (2050) and Mike Van Renootere was played at Labor Day, Union City, Rd and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation (B57). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Matthew Ho games or Mike Van Renootere games? This Matthew Ho vs Mike Van Renootere encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Matthew Ho vs Mike Van Renootere?
Matthew Ho vs Mike Van Renootere finished 1–0, a win for Matthew Ho.
What opening was played in Matthew Ho vs Mike Van Renootere?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation (ECO B57).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Matthew Ho vs Mike Van Renootere, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.