Ladislav Hlavacek vs Edgar Van Seben
14. IECG CUP Q-00011, 2010 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation (E43).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ladislav Hlavacek vs Edgar Van Seben with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ladislav Hlavacek (1810)
- Black
- Edgar Van Seben (2444)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 14. IECG CUP Q-00011
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation (E43)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ladislav Hlavacek (1810) and Edgar Van Seben (2444) was played at 14. IECG CUP Q-00011 in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation (E43). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ladislav Hlavacek games or Edgar Van Seben games? This Ladislav Hlavacek vs Edgar Van Seben encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ladislav Hlavacek vs Edgar Van Seben?
Ladislav Hlavacek vs Edgar Van Seben (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Edgar Van Seben.
What opening was played in Ladislav Hlavacek vs Edgar Van Seben?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation (ECO E43).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ladislav Hlavacek vs Edgar Van Seben, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.