Oystein Hjertenes vs Lubomir Pokora
World Senior 65+ 2016, 2016 · Result ½–½ · Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Oystein Hjertenes vs Lubomir Pokora with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Oystein Hjertenes (2060)
- Black
- Lubomir Pokora (1895)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- World Senior 65+ 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Oystein Hjertenes (2060) and Lubomir Pokora (1895) was played at World Senior 65+ 2016 in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Oystein Hjertenes games or Lubomir Pokora games? This Oystein Hjertenes vs Lubomir Pokora encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Oystein Hjertenes vs Lubomir Pokora?
Oystein Hjertenes vs Lubomir Pokora (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Oystein Hjertenes vs Lubomir Pokora?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (ECO D12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Oystein Hjertenes vs Lubomir Pokora, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.