Steve H Hilton vs Allan J Pleasants
4NCL/Div3/BCA vs. WES2, 2010 · Result 1–0 · Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (A58).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Steve H Hilton vs Allan J Pleasants with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Steve H Hilton (1891)
- Black
- Allan J Pleasants (2079)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 4NCL/Div3/BCA vs. WES2
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (A58)
About this chess game
This chess game between Steve H Hilton (1891) and Allan J Pleasants (2079) was played at 4NCL/Div3/BCA vs. WES2 in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (A58). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Steve H Hilton games or Allan J Pleasants games? This Steve H Hilton vs Allan J Pleasants encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Steve H Hilton vs Allan J Pleasants?
Steve H Hilton vs Allan J Pleasants (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Steve H Hilton.
What opening was played in Steve H Hilton vs Allan J Pleasants?
The game opened with the Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (ECO A58).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Steve H Hilton vs Allan J Pleasants, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.