Gerald Hildebrand vs Steffen Zorr
date unknown · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation, Pirc Variation (E39).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Gerald Hildebrand vs Steffen Zorr with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Gerald Hildebrand (2178)
- Black
- Steffen Zorr
- Result
- ½–½
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation, Pirc Variation (E39)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gerald Hildebrand (2178) and Steffen Zorr was played and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation, Pirc Variation (E39). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gerald Hildebrand games or Steffen Zorr games? This Gerald Hildebrand vs Steffen Zorr encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation, Pirc Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gerald Hildebrand vs Steffen Zorr?
Gerald Hildebrand vs Steffen Zorr finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Gerald Hildebrand vs Steffen Zorr?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation, Pirc Variation (ECO E39).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gerald Hildebrand vs Steffen Zorr, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.