Guntram, Dr. Hilbenz vs Karsten Neumann
2008 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Guntram, Dr. Hilbenz vs Karsten Neumann with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Guntram, Dr. Hilbenz (2013)
- Black
- Karsten Neumann (1780)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14)
About this chess game
This chess game between Guntram, Dr. Hilbenz (2013) and Karsten Neumann (1780) was played in 2008 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Guntram, Dr. Hilbenz games or Karsten Neumann games? This Guntram, Dr. Hilbenz vs Karsten Neumann encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Guntram, Dr. Hilbenz vs Karsten Neumann?
Guntram, Dr. Hilbenz vs Karsten Neumann (2008) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Guntram, Dr. Hilbenz vs Karsten Neumann?
The game opened with the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (ECO A14).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Guntram, Dr. Hilbenz vs Karsten Neumann, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.