Teruomi Higashishiba vs Kenichi Hamane
46. ch-JPN, 2013 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (C07).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Teruomi Higashishiba vs Kenichi Hamane with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Teruomi Higashishiba (2002)
- Black
- Kenichi Hamane (1884)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 46. ch-JPN
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (C07)
About this chess game
This chess game between Teruomi Higashishiba (2002) and Kenichi Hamane (1884) was played at 46. ch-JPN in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (C07). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Teruomi Higashishiba games or Kenichi Hamane games? This Teruomi Higashishiba vs Kenichi Hamane encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Teruomi Higashishiba vs Kenichi Hamane?
Teruomi Higashishiba vs Kenichi Hamane (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Teruomi Higashishiba.
What opening was played in Teruomi Higashishiba vs Kenichi Hamane?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (ECO C07).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Teruomi Higashishiba vs Kenichi Hamane, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.