Jaume Herreros Angrill vs Pedro Palacios Exposito
2012 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jaume Herreros Angrill vs Pedro Palacios Exposito with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jaume Herreros Angrill (1711)
- Black
- Pedro Palacios Exposito (1856)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jaume Herreros Angrill (1711) and Pedro Palacios Exposito (1856) was played in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jaume Herreros Angrill games or Pedro Palacios Exposito games? This Jaume Herreros Angrill vs Pedro Palacios Exposito encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jaume Herreros Angrill vs Pedro Palacios Exposito?
Jaume Herreros Angrill vs Pedro Palacios Exposito (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Jaume Herreros Angrill.
What opening was played in Jaume Herreros Angrill vs Pedro Palacios Exposito?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (ECO B21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jaume Herreros Angrill vs Pedro Palacios Exposito, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.