Francesca Hernadez Requena vs Jacint Raurell Bernada
2011 · Result ½–½ · Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (A82).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Francesca Hernadez Requena vs Jacint Raurell Bernada with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Francesca Hernadez Requena (1891)
- Black
- Jacint Raurell Bernada (2148)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (A82)
About this chess game
This chess game between Francesca Hernadez Requena (1891) and Jacint Raurell Bernada (2148) was played in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (A82). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Francesca Hernadez Requena games or Jacint Raurell Bernada games? This Francesca Hernadez Requena vs Jacint Raurell Bernada encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Francesca Hernadez Requena vs Jacint Raurell Bernada?
Francesca Hernadez Requena vs Jacint Raurell Bernada (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Francesca Hernadez Requena vs Jacint Raurell Bernada?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (ECO A82).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Francesca Hernadez Requena vs Jacint Raurell Bernada, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.