Joachim Hengelbrock vs Gisela Fischdick
2010 · Result ½–½ · Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (A12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Joachim Hengelbrock vs Gisela Fischdick with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Joachim Hengelbrock (2308)
- Black
- Gisela Fischdick (2245)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (A12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Joachim Hengelbrock (2308) and Gisela Fischdick (2245) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (A12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Joachim Hengelbrock games or Gisela Fischdick games? This Joachim Hengelbrock vs Gisela Fischdick encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Joachim Hengelbrock vs Gisela Fischdick?
Joachim Hengelbrock vs Gisela Fischdick (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Joachim Hengelbrock vs Gisela Fischdick?
The game opened with the Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (ECO A12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Joachim Hengelbrock vs Gisela Fischdick, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.