Ivacir Helbing vs Pablo Alejandro Acosta
2019 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C17).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ivacir Helbing vs Pablo Alejandro Acosta with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ivacir Helbing (1423)
- Black
- Pablo Alejandro Acosta (2074)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C17)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ivacir Helbing (1423) and Pablo Alejandro Acosta (2074) was played in 2019 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C17). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ivacir Helbing games or Pablo Alejandro Acosta games? This Ivacir Helbing vs Pablo Alejandro Acosta encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ivacir Helbing vs Pablo Alejandro Acosta?
Ivacir Helbing vs Pablo Alejandro Acosta (2019) finished 0–1, a win for Pablo Alejandro Acosta.
What opening was played in Ivacir Helbing vs Pablo Alejandro Acosta?
The game opened with the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (ECO C17).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ivacir Helbing vs Pablo Alejandro Acosta, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.