Mark Helbig vs Igor Mestek
2016 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mark Helbig vs Igor Mestek with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mark Helbig (2311)
- Black
- Igor Mestek (2077)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mark Helbig (2311) and Igor Mestek (2077) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mark Helbig games or Igor Mestek games? This Mark Helbig vs Igor Mestek encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mark Helbig vs Igor Mestek?
Mark Helbig vs Igor Mestek (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Mark Helbig vs Igor Mestek?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (ECO A29).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mark Helbig vs Igor Mestek, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.