Vincent Heinis vs Thomas Kovarcik
FRA Ch team, 1999 · Result ½–½ · Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line (D19).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vincent Heinis vs Thomas Kovarcik with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vincent Heinis (2266)
- Black
- Thomas Kovarcik (2181)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- FRA Ch team
- Year
- 1999
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line (D19)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vincent Heinis (2266) and Thomas Kovarcik (2181) was played at FRA Ch team in 1999 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line (D19). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vincent Heinis games or Thomas Kovarcik games? This Vincent Heinis vs Thomas Kovarcik encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vincent Heinis vs Thomas Kovarcik?
Vincent Heinis vs Thomas Kovarcik (1999) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Vincent Heinis vs Thomas Kovarcik?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line (ECO D19).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vincent Heinis vs Thomas Kovarcik, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.