Wenke Heinicke vs Jose Juan Castell Cantero
4. Open, 2009 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Wenke Heinicke vs Jose Juan Castell Cantero with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Wenke Heinicke (2039)
- Black
- Jose Juan Castell Cantero (1563)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 4. Open
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76)
About this chess game
This chess game between Wenke Heinicke (2039) and Jose Juan Castell Cantero (1563) was played at 4. Open in 2009 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Wenke Heinicke games or Jose Juan Castell Cantero games? This Wenke Heinicke vs Jose Juan Castell Cantero encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Wenke Heinicke vs Jose Juan Castell Cantero?
Wenke Heinicke vs Jose Juan Castell Cantero (2009) finished 1–0, a win for Wenke Heinicke.
What opening was played in Wenke Heinicke vs Jose Juan Castell Cantero?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (ECO E76).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Wenke Heinicke vs Jose Juan Castell Cantero, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.