Jonathan Hawkins vs Peter J Wells
4NCL 2015-16, 2016 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation, Pirc Variation (E39).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jonathan Hawkins vs Peter J Wells with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jonathan Hawkins (2584)
- Black
- Peter J Wells (2442)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 4NCL 2015-16
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation, Pirc Variation (E39)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jonathan Hawkins (2584) and Peter J Wells (2442) was played at 4NCL 2015-16 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation, Pirc Variation (E39). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jonathan Hawkins games or Peter J Wells games? This Jonathan Hawkins vs Peter J Wells encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation, Pirc Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jonathan Hawkins vs Peter J Wells?
Jonathan Hawkins vs Peter J Wells (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Jonathan Hawkins.
What opening was played in Jonathan Hawkins vs Peter J Wells?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation, Pirc Variation (ECO E39).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jonathan Hawkins vs Peter J Wells, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.