Bjoern Ivar Haveland vs Svein Olsen
Norway ch year?, date unknown · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Panno Main Line (E84).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Bjoern Ivar Haveland vs Svein Olsen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Bjoern Ivar Haveland
- Black
- Svein Olsen (1601)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Norway ch year?
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Panno Main Line (E84)
About this chess game
This chess game between Bjoern Ivar Haveland and Svein Olsen (1601) was played at Norway ch year? and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Panno Main Line (E84). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Bjoern Ivar Haveland games or Svein Olsen games? This Bjoern Ivar Haveland vs Svein Olsen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Panno Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Bjoern Ivar Haveland vs Svein Olsen?
Bjoern Ivar Haveland vs Svein Olsen finished 1–0, a win for Bjoern Ivar Haveland.
What opening was played in Bjoern Ivar Haveland vs Svein Olsen?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Panno Main Line (ECO E84).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Bjoern Ivar Haveland vs Svein Olsen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.