Arild Haugen vs Vadim Yakovlevich Kozlov
EU/CT2022/ct 1 4, 2022 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Arild Haugen vs Vadim Yakovlevich Kozlov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Arild Haugen (2417)
- Black
- Vadim Yakovlevich Kozlov (2410)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- EU/CT2022/ct 1 4
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32)
About this chess game
This chess game between Arild Haugen (2417) and Vadim Yakovlevich Kozlov (2410) was played at EU/CT2022/ct 1 4 in 2022 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Arild Haugen games or Vadim Yakovlevich Kozlov games? This Arild Haugen vs Vadim Yakovlevich Kozlov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Arild Haugen vs Vadim Yakovlevich Kozlov?
Arild Haugen vs Vadim Yakovlevich Kozlov (2022) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Arild Haugen vs Vadim Yakovlevich Kozlov?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (ECO E32).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Arild Haugen vs Vadim Yakovlevich Kozlov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.