Kjell Martin Haug vs Roger Løvås
NM/A/24 (NOR), 2017 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System (D28).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Kjell Martin Haug vs Roger Løvås with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Kjell Martin Haug (2028)
- Black
- Roger Løvås (1690)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- NM/A/24 (NOR)
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System (D28)
About this chess game
This chess game between Kjell Martin Haug (2028) and Roger Løvås (1690) was played at NM/A/24 (NOR) in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System (D28). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Kjell Martin Haug games or Roger Løvås games? This Kjell Martin Haug vs Roger Løvås encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Kjell Martin Haug vs Roger Løvås?
Kjell Martin Haug vs Roger Løvås (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Roger Løvås.
What opening was played in Kjell Martin Haug vs Roger Løvås?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System (ECO D28).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Kjell Martin Haug vs Roger Løvås, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.